Title page for ETD etd-11152007-125223


Type of Document Master's Thesis
Author Vinci, Justin
URN etd-11152007-125223
Title Accuracy of Cranial Coplanar Beam Therapy with BrainLAB ExacTrac Image Guidance
Degree Master of Science (M.S.)
Department Physics & Astronomy
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Kenneth Hogstrom Committee Chair
Daniel Neck Committee Member
Gabriela Gonzalez Committee Member
Isaac Rosen Committee Member
Keywords
  • Stereotactic
  • radiosurgery
  • Novalis
  • Brainlab
Date of Defense 2007-08-02
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a system for measuring 2D dose distributions in the cranium and to use this system to evaluate the accuracy of coplanar conformal therapy using ExacTrac image guidance.

Methods: Techniques were developed to measure dose distributions in each principal plane using a CIRS anthropomorphic head phantom with a custom internal film cassette. Sections of EDR2 film were cut, processed, and digitized using custom templates. Spatial and dosimetric accuracy and precision of the film system was assessed. BrainScan was used to plan a coplanar-beam treatment conforming to irradiate a 2-cm diameter x 2-cm cylindrical target. Prior to delivery phantom misalignments were imposed in combinations of ±8-mm offsets in each of the principal directions. ExacTrac X-ray correction was applied until the phantom was within an acceptance criteria of 1mm-1° (first two measurement sessions) or 0.4mm-0.4º (last two measurement sessions). Measured dose distributions on film were registered to the treatment plan and compared.

Results: Alignment errors(displacement between midpoints of planned and measured 70% isodose contours), were 0.48±0.40, -0.20±0.44 and 0.45±0.43mm along the Posterior-Anterior, Right-Left and Superior-Inferior directions, respectively, using acceptance criteria of 1mm-1°, and 0.72±0.18, 0.12±0.18 and -0.14±0.34mm, respectively, using acceptance criteria, 0.4mm-0.4°. Positional errors of the 80% isodose line were -0.36±0.43, 0.38±0.38, and 0.03±0.44mm, on the Posterior, Right, and Inferior edges of each profile, respectively, and 0.68 ±0.40, -0.14 ±0.38, and 0.88±0.40mm for the Anterior, Left, and Superior edges, respectively for the 1mm-1° criteria. Using the 0.4mm-0.4° criteria, errors were -0.35±0.23, 0.31± 0.18, and 0.72±0.27mm on the Posterior, Left and Inferior portion of each profile respectively and 1.12±0.18, 0.22±0.23, and 0.35±0.33mm for the Anterior, Left and Superior portions, respectively. Data ranged approximately two standard deviations about the mean. Winston-Lutz tests with errors of approximately 0.5mm correlated with increased Anterior error in three measurement sessions.

Conclusions: The ExacTrac system is capable of achieving sub-mm(2σ) accuracy given the alignment errors were small(<0.3mm) when Winston-Lutz results were small(<0.2mm), indicating pre-treatment corrections could be made.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Vinci_Thesis_FINALEDIT.pdf 2.55 Mb 00:11:49 00:06:04 00:05:19 00:02:39 00:00:13

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact LSU-ETD Support.