Title page for ETD etd-06302011-133644

Type of Document Master's Thesis
Author Poudel, Krishna Prasad
Author's Email Address kpoude2@tigers.lsu.edu, ecokrishna@gmail.com
URN etd-06302011-133644
Title Evaluation of Methods to Predict Weibull Parameters for Characterizing Diameter Distributions
Degree Master of Science (M.S.)
Department Renewable Natural Resources
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Cao, Quang V. Committee Chair
Chang, Sun J. Committee Member
Dean, Thomas J. Committee Member
  • Hybrid
  • Percentiles
  • Moments
  • CDF Regression
Date of Defense 2011-06-21
Availability unrestricted
Compared to other distribution functions, the Weibull distribution has been more widely used in describing diameter distributions because of its flexibility and relative simplicity. Parameters of the Weibull distribution are generally predicted either by the parameter prediction method or by the parameter recovery method. The coefficients of the regression equations for predicting Weibull parameters, moments, or percentiles are often estimated by use of different approaches such as ordinary least squares (OLS), seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) or cumulative distribution function regression (CDFR). However, there is no strong rationale for preferring one method over the other. We developed and evaluated different methods of predicting parameters of Weibull distribution to characterize diameter distribution using data from the Southwide Seed Source Study.

The SUR and the CDFR approaches were applied to ten different parameter prediction and parameter recovery methods. A modified CDFR approach was developed by modifying the CDFR technique such that the CDF is computed using information from diameter classes instead of individual trees as in the CDFR approach. These methods were evaluated based on four goodness-of-fit statistics (Anderson-Darling, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, negative Log-Likelihood, and Error Index). The CDFR approach provided better results than the SUR approach for all methods. The Modified CDFR approach consistently provided better results than the SUR approach, and was superior to the CDFR approach in all evaluation statistics but the Anderson-Darling statistic.

  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Poudel_Thesis.pdf 534.80 Kb 00:02:28 00:01:16 00:01:06 00:00:33 00:00:02

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact LSU-ETD Support.