Title page for ETD etd-04122011-150559

Type of Document Master's Thesis
Author Wieland, Lindsay Michelle
Author's Email Address lwiela1@tigers.lsu.edu, lwieland48@gmail.com
URN etd-04122011-150559
Title Seed Rain and Advance Regeneration in Secondary Succession in the Brazilian Amazon
Degree Master of Science (M.S.)
Department Biological Sciences
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Williamson, G. Bruce Committee Chair
Stevens, Richard D Committee Member
Stouffer, Philip C Committee Member
  • Amazon
  • Brazil
  • advance regeneration
  • seed dispersal
  • secondary succession
  • Cecropia
  • Vismia
Date of Defense 2011-03-17
Availability unrestricted
Forest regeneration on abandoned land in the Brazilian Amazon depends first and foremost on prior land-use history. Abandoned clearcuts become dominated by Cecropia trees, but contain a rich mix of other arboreal genera and succession proceeds rapidly to a diverse forest. In contrast, abandoned land that has been burned repeatedly for pastures becomes dominated almost completely by Vismia trees and remains in monogeneric stands gaining few new genera over the same time interval. I tested the hypothesis that areas with repeated burns would have more re-sprouts, particularly Vismia re-sprouts. I also predicted that in monogeneric Vismia stands, seed dispersal would be limited to few bat-dispersed genera while there would be more diverse seed rain in Cecropia, particularly from bird dispersers.

In order to test these hypotheses, stands with different land-use histories were evaluated in terms of tree, palm, shrub and liana abundance and diversity, as well as whether they germinated from seed or grew as re-sprouts from the root. I found that Vismia stems were one hundred percent re-sprouts in Vismia stands. In Cecropia stands, 93% of Vismia stems germinated from seed. There were no significant differences in the abundance of re-sprouts by Cecropia and all other species, regardless of stand type.

To test how seed dispersal in Cecropia and Vismia stands differs, I collected seeds fallen into seed traps by bird and bat dispersers as well as from fecal samples collected principally from mist netted birds. I found that both bird and bat dispersers deposited a more diverse seed assemblage into Vismia stands than Cecropia stands. Overall, bats disperse more Vismia seeds while birds disperse more Miconia seeds, regardless of stand type.

My results suggest that seed dispersal does not drive the differences in succession found in Cecropia and Vismia second growth. However, the capability of seeds to germinate and recruit in Vismia stands warrants further investigation. I suggest that the use of repeated fire should be limited as much as possible due to the long term effects on succession after site abandonment.

  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Wieland_thesis.pdf 1.09 Mb 00:05:03 00:02:35 00:02:16 00:01:08 00:00:05

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact LSU-ETD Support.