Type of Document Dissertation Author Phares, Keitha Ilene URN etd-0327102-091522 Title The Relationship between Author and Audience: Case Study of a Young-Adult Author and a Student Audience Degree Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) Department Curriculum and Instruction Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title Nancy Nelson Committee Chair Earl Cheek Committee Member Margaret Stewart Committee Member Pam Monroe Committee Member Margaret Parker Dean's Representative Keywords
- author-audience relationship
- young adult literature
- reader response
Date of Defense 2002-02-28 Availability unrestricted AbstractHow does author relate to audience? This overarching question guided a case study focused on author Rick Norman and his novel Fielderís Choice. Specific questions were (1) What was, and is, this authorís conception of his audience for the book? (2) How do members of the audienceóspecifically five high school studentsórespond to the novel? (3) How do the audienceís responses relate to the authorís stated intentions? Data came from the following sources: interviews with the author, the student readers, and the editor of the book; studentsí written responses to the book and the authorís written reactions to those responses; an interactive dialogue between the author and the students; records and documents provided by the author; and reviews of the book. Data analysis employed Glaser and Straussís (1967) comparative method and Spradleyís (1979) developmental research sequence.
Findings include the following: (1) This author saw his audience, which he portrayed as multi-faceted and dynamic, through the lens of self. He attributed to his audience his own characteristics when he originally planned and wrote the book and also when he talked about it ten years later. Self was at the center of his generic audience as well as his defined audience. (2) The audience of readers in this study varied in the extent to which they connected with the author. Most of them did, however, speculate about his intentions relative to the content as well as to text features. (3) Author intention and audience response did not always match. When mismatches were revealed in written and oral exchanges, subsequent dialogue between author and audience was directed to mutual understanding. The author wanted to learn what there was in his writing that led the readers to unintended meanings, and the readers wanted to learn why the author wrote as he did.
This study, focused on author-audience relationship, fits into a growing body of work examining connections between reading and writing. Its uniqueness lies in its dual focus on both author intention and audience response and in the opportunities provided for author and audience to meet to discuss intentions and responses.
Filename Size Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
28.8 Modem 56K Modem ISDN (64 Kb) ISDN (128 Kb) Higher-speed Access Appendixes_and_Vita.pdf 264.75 Kb 00:01:13 00:00:37 00:00:33 00:00:16 00:00:01 ChapterFive.pdf 132.79 Kb 00:00:36 00:00:18 00:00:16 00:00:08 < 00:00:01 ChapterFour.pdf 298.86 Kb 00:01:23 00:00:42 00:00:37 00:00:18 00:00:01 ChapterOne.pdf 123.27 Kb 00:00:34 00:00:17 00:00:15 00:00:07 < 00:00:01 ChapterThree.pdf 230.69 Kb 00:01:04 00:00:32 00:00:28 00:00:14 00:00:01 ChapterTwo.pdf 183.16 Kb 00:00:50 00:00:26 00:00:22 00:00:11 < 00:00:01 FrontMaterial.pdf 71.49 Kb 00:00:19 00:00:10 00:00:08 00:00:04 < 00:00:01 References.pdf 100.79 Kb 00:00:27 00:00:14 00:00:12 00:00:06 < 00:00:01
If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact LSU-ETD Support.